<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Good Reasons Why Google Has Lost It On The Ajax Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:42:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaimie Sirovich</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaimie Sirovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/?p=2813#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a lot of redundant work to do so, however.

Anything involving &#039;escaping&#039; tends to cause problems for low-level programmers who don&#039;t know what a grammar is.  There is no misconception on that.

I predict Google AJAX will go the way of the dodo pretty soon, and if you do a quick Google search you&#039;ll see I&#039;m not the only one who thinks so.  I just said it a year or two ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a lot of redundant work to do so, however.</p>
<p>Anything involving &#8216;escaping&#8217; tends to cause problems for low-level programmers who don&#8217;t know what a grammar is.  There is no misconception on that.</p>
<p>I predict Google AJAX will go the way of the dodo pretty soon, and if you do a quick Google search you&#8217;ll see I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks so.  I just said it a year or two ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/?p=2813#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>I think you have a bunch of misconceptions. Google does require you to have a headless browser. That is just a suggestion if you don&#039;t want to write html for each request. 

The way google does it is actually really simple, not confusing, and really the only way it can be done since browsers and spiders don&#039;t send text after # to servers.

You just get the text after #! turned into _escaped_fragment_ get var...  You parse it and add meta if you need.

I think Facebook might do that too... or they might be just plainly putting it in as a get var key...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a bunch of misconceptions. Google does require you to have a headless browser. That is just a suggestion if you don&#8217;t want to write html for each request. </p>
<p>The way google does it is actually really simple, not confusing, and really the only way it can be done since browsers and spiders don&#8217;t send text after # to servers.</p>
<p>You just get the text after #! turned into _escaped_fragment_ get var&#8230;  You parse it and add meta if you need.</p>
<p>I think Facebook might do that too&#8230; or they might be just plainly putting it in as a get var key&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose M. Arranz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose M. Arranz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/?p=2813#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>Another and better alternative to Google approach: ItsNat

With ItsNat you develop a Single Page Interface (AJAX intensive) application and (almost) automatically the same is page based when JavaScript is disabled or ignored (like search engine crawlers see your site).

Take a look:

The Single Page Interface Manifesto
http://itsnat.sourceforge.net/php/spim/spi_manifesto_en.php

Single Page Interface Web Site With ItsNat
http://itsnat.sourceforge.net/index.php?_page=support.tutorial.spi_site

SPI web site online demo
http://www.innowhere.com:8080/spitut/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another and better alternative to Google approach: ItsNat</p>
<p>With ItsNat you develop a Single Page Interface (AJAX intensive) application and (almost) automatically the same is page based when JavaScript is disabled or ignored (like search engine crawlers see your site).</p>
<p>Take a look:</p>
<p>The Single Page Interface Manifesto<br />
<a href="http://itsnat.sourceforge.net/php/spim/spi_manifesto_en.php" rel="nofollow">http://itsnat.sourceforge.net/php/spim/spi_manifesto_en.php</a></p>
<p>Single Page Interface Web Site With ItsNat<br />
<a href="http://itsnat.sourceforge.net/index.php?_page=support.tutorial.spi_site" rel="nofollow">http://itsnat.sourceforge.net/index.php?_page=support.tutorial.spi_site</a></p>
<p>SPI web site online demo<br />
<a href="http://www.innowhere.com:8080/spitut/" rel="nofollow">http://www.innowhere.com:8080/spitut/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines, for all of their innovation, fail innovators &#171; baby blog</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines, for all of their innovation, fail innovators &#171; baby blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/?p=2813#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>[...] Guidelines – basic principles) is nonsensical. Especially when paired with the latest news of Google’s attempt to solve the AJAX issue – developers are left to struggle with increasingly outdated search engine technology in an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guidelines – basic principles) is nonsensical. Especially when paired with the latest news of Google’s attempt to solve the AJAX issue – developers are left to struggle with increasingly outdated search engine technology in an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Search Engines Fail When Improving Your Site &#124; SEO Articles - SEO Optimization - SEO Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>How Search Engines Fail When Improving Your Site &#124; SEO Articles - SEO Optimization - SEO Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/?p=2813#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>[...] Guidelines – basic principles) is nonsensical. Especially when paired with the latest news of Google’s attempt to solve the AJAX issue – developers are left to struggle with increasingly outdated search engine technology in an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guidelines – basic principles) is nonsensical. Especially when paired with the latest news of Google’s attempt to solve the AJAX issue – developers are left to struggle with increasingly outdated search engine technology in an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines, for all of their innovation, fail innovators - SiteLogic &#8211; Marketing Logic</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/3-good-reasons-google-lost-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines, for all of their innovation, fail innovators - SiteLogic &#8211; Marketing Logic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/?p=2813#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>[...] Guidelines – basic principles) is nonsensical. Especially when paired with the latest news of Google’s attempt to solve the AJAX issue – developers are left to struggle with increasingly outdated search engine technology in an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guidelines – basic principles) is nonsensical. Especially when paired with the latest news of Google’s attempt to solve the AJAX issue – developers are left to struggle with increasingly outdated search engine technology in an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

