<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Buffs Browser Market With Chrome But Will It Succeed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/google-buffs-browser-market-with-chrome-but-will-it-succeed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/google-buffs-browser-market-with-chrome-but-will-it-succeed</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:42:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chess Strategies For Beginners</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/google-buffs-browser-market-with-chrome-but-will-it-succeed/comment-page-1#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Chess Strategies For Beginners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/articles/2008/09/google-buffs-browser-market-with-chrome-but-will-it-succeed.html#comment-976</guid>
		<description>Google chrome is not that good. Sure it’s got some neat features, but the fact that Google owns it, it will *never* have the ability to block ads.
But as far as speed is concern, chrome is far more away then the other browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google chrome is not that good. Sure it’s got some neat features, but the fact that Google owns it, it will *never* have the ability to block ads.<br />
But as far as speed is concern, chrome is far more away then the other browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/google-buffs-browser-market-with-chrome-but-will-it-succeed/comment-page-1#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/articles/2008/09/google-buffs-browser-market-with-chrome-but-will-it-succeed.html#comment-975</guid>
		<description>I downloaded and started using Chrome a few weeks ago. I&#039;ve found that I use it on my desktop where I do most of my work, almost none. But on my older, slower laptop where I do a good bit of surfing with the intention of reading online, I use it most often over Firefox and Internet Explorer. I even made it the default.

I haven&#039;t really thought about why the difference, but you&#039;re right about it being faster, and that could very well be the clincher for me. My personal time is valuable and I have no need for add-ons when I&#039;m reading articles for fun. :-)

Of course, if they ever get it spiffed up, then I might convert on my working computers too. We&#039;ll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded and started using Chrome a few weeks ago. I&#8217;ve found that I use it on my desktop where I do most of my work, almost none. But on my older, slower laptop where I do a good bit of surfing with the intention of reading online, I use it most often over Firefox and Internet Explorer. I even made it the default.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t really thought about why the difference, but you&#8217;re right about it being faster, and that could very well be the clincher for me. My personal time is valuable and I have no need for add-ons when I&#8217;m reading articles for fun. <img src='http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Of course, if they ever get it spiffed up, then I might convert on my working computers too. We&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

