Link Builders: Cache Date vs. Page Rank to Determine a Site’s Value

New to the Search Marketing Standard Blog?

Subscribe to our blog via our RSS feed and receive updates and tips.

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Link Builders: Cache Date vs. Page Rank to Determine a Site’s Value”.

About the Author

(55 Posts)

Garrett French educates SEO and PR teams on content and engagement-based link building strategies that drive targeted referral traffic and deliver SERP domination. Learn more about him and his services at CitationLabs.com.

4 Comments*

  1. IMAutoPilot says:

    You covered a lot of ground there. From link building to formulas to MLK. We actually do pay attention to PR. No matter what, a high PR is generally a good sign and if the site is on topic, it is probably worth pursuing for a link.

  2. kelvin newman says:

    I tried to test out Aaron Wall’s Idea and wrote it up in a blog piece http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/2007/02/has-google-cache-killed-page-rank.html

  3. Mike says:

    Its true that the cache date is a very important SEO factor, especially when exchanging links with other sites but Page rank is also essential. Good article overall, thanks for writing :)

  4. Art Driver says:

    Hi!

    Are there any formulas out there that can help to estimate how many link with what PR rank are needed in order to bring the site from let’s say position 20 in Google to top 5?

    thanks
    Alex

Share Your Thoughts