<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money Saving Pay-Per-Click Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:42:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoodia</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips/comment-page-1#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoodia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/articles/2009/03/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips.html#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the following tips, i think for ppc the keyword selection and keyword prominence is very important,it should not be as the regular seo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the following tips, i think for ppc the keyword selection and keyword prominence is very important,it should not be as the regular seo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Brennan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips/comment-page-1#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/articles/2009/03/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips.html#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>Constant attention to the SEO side of the house as well.

Without consideration, overall PPC cost could rise as ad spend is cut. Site best practice current strategies and algorithm&#039;s that change  determine relevancy and higher quality scores... = lower per click cost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Constant attention to the SEO side of the house as well.</p>
<p>Without consideration, overall PPC cost could rise as ad spend is cut. Site best practice current strategies and algorithm&#8217;s that change  determine relevancy and higher quality scores&#8230; = lower per click cost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david dealaday</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips/comment-page-1#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>david dealaday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/articles/2009/03/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips.html#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>@ Rob Bunting I agree with you, and will proably vote that way as well...well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rob Bunting I agree with you, and will proably vote that way as well&#8230;well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bunting</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips/comment-page-1#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/articles/2009/03/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips.html#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>There are some good tips here Rebecca, nice article.

I would definitely recommend folks re-consider listings, particularly on Google where you can see results by site and exclude those that not converting for you or aren&#039;t as relevant to your products.  Also, try adding specific Placements in Google so you can place your ads on specific properites.

As for having too many keywords, a couple other suggestions for refinement include narrowing your match type from broad to &quot;phrase&quot; or [exact] matching and adding negative keywords where appropriate.   For example one of my clients sells pirate hats like you would wear to a costume party, so we could try a phrase match for &quot;pirate costume hat&quot; and add the negative keyword -Pittsburgh so that people looking for a Pirates baseball cap would not see my clients&#039; ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some good tips here Rebecca, nice article.</p>
<p>I would definitely recommend folks re-consider listings, particularly on Google where you can see results by site and exclude those that not converting for you or aren&#8217;t as relevant to your products.  Also, try adding specific Placements in Google so you can place your ads on specific properites.</p>
<p>As for having too many keywords, a couple other suggestions for refinement include narrowing your match type from broad to &#8220;phrase&#8221; or [exact] matching and adding negative keywords where appropriate.   For example one of my clients sells pirate hats like you would wear to a costume party, so we could try a phrase match for &#8220;pirate costume hat&#8221; and add the negative keyword -Pittsburgh so that people looking for a Pirates baseball cap would not see my clients&#8217; ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oceanside SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips/comment-page-1#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Oceanside SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/articles/2009/03/money-saving-pay-per-click-tips.html#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>Nowadays it seems everybody is bringing back the Content Network as a
cost efficient option.

Might be time to give it a try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowadays it seems everybody is bringing back the Content Network as a<br />
cost efficient option.</p>
<p>Might be time to give it a try!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

