Comments on: URL Structure And SEO

By: Dallas SEO

Dallas SEO — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:34:13 +0000

I have seen an improvement on performance of tertiary pages when we have removed necessary directories like /products/. This is great information, thanks for putting this together!

By: Get Higher CTR and Ranking Using the Best Permalink Structure for SEO

Get Higher CTR and Ranking Using the Best Permalink Structure for SEO — Tue, 24 May 2011 07:58:52 +0000

[...] directory systems that match the hierarchy of a website’s taxonomy, to silo content, and to keep URLs short and simple. However, some might argue that using directories may push keywords used in the page name beyond [...]

By: Ramsharan

Ramsharan — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:03 +0000

really nice information for url structure but still i am confusing about this topic.

can anybody suggest me?

http://www.test.com/product/old-computer.html
or
http://www.test.com/old-computer.html

which one is best url structure?

By: Spain holiday

Spain holiday — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:07:36 +0000

[quote]Google’s Matt Cutts has gone on record as saying the search engine is happy to crawl any of those pages and it doesn’t really matter which extension you choose of the three.[/quote]

So you say that html, htm, php is valid, but bin etc is not.
Then what about .hey, .id22 etc…
?

By: SEO Leeds

SEO Leeds — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:40:31 +0000

Great article – really useful for the SEO newbie and old pros alike. We’ve written a brief guide on best practices for url structure which goes well with this article – it includes a few extra pointers as well. Hopefully, it will help people to get their site set up in the best possible way:

best practices in url structure for best seo performance.

Cheers!

By: Elmer

Elmer — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:57:29 +0000

“Your Choice Of File Extension Matters”

DLL, EXE and BIN as file extensions? I haven’t come across them as web pages yet, so it really doesn’t matter if they aren’t because they’re not pages at all.
.-= Elmer´s last blog ..10 Most Read SEO Hong Kong Articles of 2009 =-.

By: joker

joker — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:04:12 +0000

Thanks, it is very useful for me.

but how about an ongoing website? the urls already existed, what if i changed them to new urls? how about the old urls?

Thanks.
.-= joker´s last blog ..Men and beer in common =-.

By: Adam Elkin

Adam Elkin — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:20:06 +0000

I’m curious what your opinion is about the effect of establishing multiple URLs (which resolve to a single site) can have on SEO?

For example a company named ABC Associates has an established website with a URL of “ABCAssociates.com”. The company performs plastic molding and manufactures Drive Cams. Would it benefit them from an SEO perspective to register additional URL’s such as “DriveCams.com” and “Plasticmolding.com” and resolve them back to “ABCAssociates.com”?

By: Reality Handbook

Reality Handbook — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:20:43 +0000

Some good points, but really the .html is considered superfluous these days. As is the www.

Tim Berners Lee wrote “Cool URIs don’t change” and that’s sort of the “must read” on the topic.

http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI

By: nsem

nsem — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:47:11 +0000

Good articles, and i think much better if you take most imformation keywords close to your domain.

domain/keywords/../../